Performance comparisons » History » Version 9
Greg Burri, 04/18/2012 07:00 PM
1 | 1 | Greg Burri | h1. Performance comparisons |
---|---|---|---|
2 | |||
3 | |||
4 | h2. D-LAN vs ApexDC++ |
||
5 | |||
6 | h3. Setup |
||
7 | |||
8 | 6 | Greg Burri | We measured the transfer time and the number of CPU cycles for *one* transfer at a time of a 3.2 GiB file. This is a particular case, the performance of both systems may varies in a concurrent downloading and uploading case. |
9 | 5 | Greg Burri | |
10 | 1 | Greg Burri | * We used two computers on a gigabit LAN. |
11 | * There is a local DC++ hub: ADCH++ 2.8.0. |
||
12 | 4 | Greg Burri | * We didn't do any other operations during a transfer. |
13 | 1 | Greg Burri | * We download/upload only one file at the same time. We cleared queued and file before each measurement (the file is deleted from the trash). |
14 | |||
15 | * OS: Windows 7 64bits |
||
16 | 6 | Greg Burri | * Download computer CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 |
17 | * Upload computer CPU: Intel Core i7 860 |
||
18 | 1 | Greg Burri | * Apex version: v1.5.2.1276 (64bits) |
19 | 2 | Greg Burri | * D-LAN version: 1.1.0 Beta6 |
20 | 1 | Greg Burri | |
21 | 9 | Greg Burri | * Software used to count cycles: "Process Hacker 2":http://processhacker.sourceforge.net/ |
22 | |||
23 | 2 | Greg Burri | |
24 | 1 | Greg Burri | h3. Download speed |
25 | |||
26 | We repeated the transfer three times. |
||
27 | |||
28 | 4 | Greg Burri | | |_. # 1 |_. # 2 |_. # 3 |_. Average |_. Average rate | |
29 | 7 | Greg Burri | |_. ApexDC++ | 160 s | 167 s | 163 s | 163.3 s | _20.1 MiB/s_ | |
30 | |_. D-LAN | 78 s | 87 s | 86 s | 83.7 s | _39.2 MiB/s_ | |
||
31 | 3 | Greg Burri | |
32 | 1 | Greg Burri | h3. CPU Cycles |
33 | 2 | Greg Burri | |
34 | 8 | Greg Burri | | [Million of cycles] |_. Download |_. Upload |_. Total | |
35 | 7 | Greg Burri | |_. ApexDC++ | 199'613 | 272'655 | _472'268_ | |
36 | |_. D-LAN (Core + GUI) | 103'914 (88'800 + 15'114) | 24'086 (20'969 + 3'117) | _128'000_ | |